ROME - Poor but excluded from the social card. The poorest of the poor homeless, the poor immigrants because they do not Italian citizens, the new poor, young and insecure. Poor. The social card was the only measure of poverty made by the government but failed the target. He brought a benefit to no more than 3-4 per cent of households, leaving out the vast majority of those who would need. The amendment included in the so-called Milleproroghe, omnibus decree that raised the social card also as a private student with the entry in the field of institutions "charities involved in voluntary work, is the implicit confirmation. The social card did not work while Italy - Marco Revelli as he wrote in his "Poor us" - continues to be "a country structurally fragile, exposed to the risk of widespread deprivation, with pockets of poverty than the majority of our European partners. " We have eight million people in relative poverty and more than three million in absolute poverty. In all, nearly four million poor families. In just over two years were 750 000 people who have used the card purchases. More to the south and the north. But the Ministry of Finance in that number there are those who bought with the card once. So there are less people using it constantly, 400-500 thousand. Why did you change just one of the requirements (age,
for example) to not have more right. Yet the government estimated that 1.3 million potential beneficiaries of the prepaid card. Why did this happen? Why you chose the card instead of a social support instrument for direct income as in Europe? Because the poor are left out? Why, now, it opens the entrance of the private? And as individuals? LOOK AT THE ESCLUSIONILa VIDEOINCHIESTA a social card was not designed for everyone. Meanwhile, cut off aliens as residents and, in many cases, poor. The social card is only for the Italians, while the share of foreigners who have lost their jobs because of the long global crisis is constantly growing. The tables say the latest "Report on the policies against poverty and social exclusion" delivered to the government before the summer in 2007 were foreigners without jobs, 9.3 percent of the total, rose to 13.5 percent in 2008 and 16.6 per cent in 2009. In Turin every hundred new members in mobility lists 37 are foreigners. But they are out of the social card. Out as young people with unstable work and no children under three years. Because apart from the requirements of income (including no more than 6,300 per annum or € 8,300 if age and many other constraints) for the social card you must be 65 or over or under 3. Italy, in fact, not a country for young people. They, however, are getting poorer: those under 34 were 4.6 per cent of the total, now rose to 4.8 percent, and the age group between 35 and 44 years increased from 5 to 5.6 per cent. It is a social metamorphosis, accelerated by the recession, which the government seems not to have seen. "They thought only a limited type of family, a party of pensioners, but not for young people. For them, young people are not poor," says Stephen Trombley, head of system services of the CGIL. Not even the CISL, this time, do you agree with the government. Peter Cerrito, confederal secretary: "The reintroduction of the social card is a wrong measure because it has the pretext of helping the poorest pensioners. But instead there is the idea behind cultural policy in which we must fight only the absolute poverty while spreading and growing impoverishment of those who receive pensions medium-low. "lobbies perhaps there is also behind this amendment would by job title, Maurizio Sacconi, and presented by Senator the PDL Maurizio Castro, close collaborator of the minister, and that in the nineties led to the Industrial Relations Electrolux proposing daring forms of union participation by introducing the first to also call on the job, the job to call. But what is the purpose of the modification ordered by Sacconi? What are the lobby that you want to promote? Certainly there is an element of ideology. There's the Italian version of Big society theorizes that the British Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron. There is the idea of \u200b\u200ba post-Fordist welfare state light and very private, deep down, echoing the slogans of the annual meeting of Rimini "Communion and Liberation" with his army of volunteers, its network, and the plots with the cooperative business canteens and personal services. Individuals rather than the rule, which have attracted public as Maurizio Sacconi Giulio Tremonti, once a socialist CL hours of adoption. "It's the classic subsidiarity: more companies, not state," said Castro. For this you want to entrust to institutions "charitable" a piece of the management of social card. They will, once selected (within thirty days of approval comes a decree of the Ministry of Labour), to identify those truly in need. An empirical examination in the territory. Without the public. But who will control? What will be, if there is, the role of Commons? There are 50 million additional provision (for the social card there are still 550 to spend while they were spent on 500) for an initial trial in a dozen cities with more than 250 000 inhabitants. "Why - Castro says - the" center "by its very nature a legal-bureaucratic approach. The" center "does not see the poor, the suburbs, the slums." Behold, the implicit admission of a semi-failure. Why, exactly, the homeless, the social card, with its charge of 40 Euros per month plus 20 for those who use natural gas, have not ever seen, nor sought. The see through the private sector? And the youth will be included insecure? O remain invisible? THE MODELLOMa what they think potential "charitable"? Caritas, for example. Attacks Deputy Francesco Marsico: "Caritas has never requested a change of this kind." He never asked why not share it. Marsico: "The problem of social card, which excludes a large proportion of poor families and experimentation Government decided not resolve this critical background. In fact, adds others. Why is the issue of compliance with the constitutional principle of fairness and for what regarding the subjects addressed, both on the side of providers. " That is not who wants Caritas.Il social card model, however, is spreading along the Peninsula. There are regions, provinces and municipalities that have decided to integrate the paper. He decided the Friuli (120 € every two months), the Province of Latina (40 €), the Cities of Alexandria (80 €), Susegana (40 €), Cassola (80 €), Grade (80 € but only for children under three years). It is a road. Cristiano Gori, a professor of social policy at Catholic University of Milan, coordinator of the ACLI proposal for a different social card, has a pragmatic approach. Remember, for example, have increased the income of families who obtained the card by about 8 percent is no small thing. But not enough. Because the social card tremontiana-sacconiana can not give more. Even in the private student version. "We need a universal tool - says Gori - A measure based on the population in absolute poverty. It is no longer a question of resources because there are almost 500 million. "It offers a prepaid card for all poor families, which is extended to foreigners, providing € 129 per month for climbing in areas where the cost of living is higher, which providing access to services to the person and not just buying food, which finally gives a role to municipalities. Another way to social card. And for all the poor.
for example) to not have more right. Yet the government estimated that 1.3 million potential beneficiaries of the prepaid card. Why did this happen? Why you chose the card instead of a social support instrument for direct income as in Europe? Because the poor are left out? Why, now, it opens the entrance of the private? And as individuals? LOOK AT THE ESCLUSIONILa VIDEOINCHIESTA a social card was not designed for everyone. Meanwhile, cut off aliens as residents and, in many cases, poor. The social card is only for the Italians, while the share of foreigners who have lost their jobs because of the long global crisis is constantly growing. The tables say the latest "Report on the policies against poverty and social exclusion" delivered to the government before the summer in 2007 were foreigners without jobs, 9.3 percent of the total, rose to 13.5 percent in 2008 and 16.6 per cent in 2009. In Turin every hundred new members in mobility lists 37 are foreigners. But they are out of the social card. Out as young people with unstable work and no children under three years. Because apart from the requirements of income (including no more than 6,300 per annum or € 8,300 if age and many other constraints) for the social card you must be 65 or over or under 3. Italy, in fact, not a country for young people. They, however, are getting poorer: those under 34 were 4.6 per cent of the total, now rose to 4.8 percent, and the age group between 35 and 44 years increased from 5 to 5.6 per cent. It is a social metamorphosis, accelerated by the recession, which the government seems not to have seen. "They thought only a limited type of family, a party of pensioners, but not for young people. For them, young people are not poor," says Stephen Trombley, head of system services of the CGIL. Not even the CISL, this time, do you agree with the government. Peter Cerrito, confederal secretary: "The reintroduction of the social card is a wrong measure because it has the pretext of helping the poorest pensioners. But instead there is the idea behind cultural policy in which we must fight only the absolute poverty while spreading and growing impoverishment of those who receive pensions medium-low. "lobbies perhaps there is also behind this amendment would by job title, Maurizio Sacconi, and presented by Senator the PDL Maurizio Castro, close collaborator of the minister, and that in the nineties led to the Industrial Relations Electrolux proposing daring forms of union participation by introducing the first to also call on the job, the job to call. But what is the purpose of the modification ordered by Sacconi? What are the lobby that you want to promote? Certainly there is an element of ideology. There's the Italian version of Big society theorizes that the British Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron. There is the idea of \u200b\u200ba post-Fordist welfare state light and very private, deep down, echoing the slogans of the annual meeting of Rimini "Communion and Liberation" with his army of volunteers, its network, and the plots with the cooperative business canteens and personal services. Individuals rather than the rule, which have attracted public as Maurizio Sacconi Giulio Tremonti, once a socialist CL hours of adoption. "It's the classic subsidiarity: more companies, not state," said Castro. For this you want to entrust to institutions "charitable" a piece of the management of social card. They will, once selected (within thirty days of approval comes a decree of the Ministry of Labour), to identify those truly in need. An empirical examination in the territory. Without the public. But who will control? What will be, if there is, the role of Commons? There are 50 million additional provision (for the social card there are still 550 to spend while they were spent on 500) for an initial trial in a dozen cities with more than 250 000 inhabitants. "Why - Castro says - the" center "by its very nature a legal-bureaucratic approach. The" center "does not see the poor, the suburbs, the slums." Behold, the implicit admission of a semi-failure. Why, exactly, the homeless, the social card, with its charge of 40 Euros per month plus 20 for those who use natural gas, have not ever seen, nor sought. The see through the private sector? And the youth will be included insecure? O remain invisible? THE MODELLOMa what they think potential "charitable"? Caritas, for example. Attacks Deputy Francesco Marsico: "Caritas has never requested a change of this kind." He never asked why not share it. Marsico: "The problem of social card, which excludes a large proportion of poor families and experimentation Government decided not resolve this critical background. In fact, adds others. Why is the issue of compliance with the constitutional principle of fairness and for what regarding the subjects addressed, both on the side of providers. " That is not who wants Caritas.Il social card model, however, is spreading along the Peninsula. There are regions, provinces and municipalities that have decided to integrate the paper. He decided the Friuli (120 € every two months), the Province of Latina (40 €), the Cities of Alexandria (80 €), Susegana (40 €), Cassola (80 €), Grade (80 € but only for children under three years). It is a road. Cristiano Gori, a professor of social policy at Catholic University of Milan, coordinator of the ACLI proposal for a different social card, has a pragmatic approach. Remember, for example, have increased the income of families who obtained the card by about 8 percent is no small thing. But not enough. Because the social card tremontiana-sacconiana can not give more. Even in the private student version. "We need a universal tool - says Gori - A measure based on the population in absolute poverty. It is no longer a question of resources because there are almost 500 million. "It offers a prepaid card for all poor families, which is extended to foreigners, providing € 129 per month for climbing in areas where the cost of living is higher, which providing access to services to the person and not just buying food, which finally gives a role to municipalities. Another way to social card. And for all the poor.
taken from The Repubblica.it 18.02 .2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment